SciRise Logo

    The data behind the predictions

    Not Just More Data.
    Better Data.

    Anyone can ingest IRS filings. We resolve, clean, filter, and validate every grant so the data actually tells you something useful.

    The SciRise Foundation Intelligence Dataset

    Every number represents verified, entity-resolved, and connected data.

    4.8M+

    Grants Analyzed

    Every grant entity-resolved to a verified nonprofit

    16,000+

    Foundations

    Actively distributing $1M+ annually

    300,000+

    Nonprofits

    Matched and verified across filings

    $200B+

    Annual Giving

    Total foundation giving tracked

    670K+

    Funding Relationships

    Verified foundation-to-nonprofit connections

    370K+

    Foundation Contacts

    Officers, directors, and trustees

    Nationwide

    Geographic Coverage

    All 50 states and US territories

    4 Years

    Filing Depth

    Multi-year patterns, not single snapshots

    All data sourced from IRS 990 and 990-PF filings. Updated as new filings become available.

    The Problem With Raw 990 Data

    Most foundation data tools stop at ingestion. They import IRS filings and present them as-is. That creates real problems.

    Unresolved recipient names

    "Duke University" appears as 50+ different text strings across IRS filings. Without entity resolution, each variant looks like a separate organization.

    Intermediaries counted as funders

    Donor-advised funds and fiscal sponsors appear as grant-makers, inflating foundation counts and obscuring who actually makes funding decisions.

    Single-year snapshots

    One year of data misses patterns. A foundation that consistently funds health research looks identical to one that made a single one-off grant.

    No validation

    Without testing against real outcomes, there's no way to know if the data actually helps you find funders or just looks impressive.

    What We Do Differently

    Every grant in SciRise goes through a multi-stage quality process before it reaches you.

    Step 1

    Ingest IRS Filings

    We start with multi-year IRS 990 and 990-PF filings, the authoritative public record of foundation giving in the United States.

    Step 2

    Resolve Every Grant

    Raw filings list recipients as free-text names. We match every grant to a verified nonprofit using multi-stage entity resolution, not just string matching.

    Step 3

    Remove Intermediaries

    Donor-advised funds, fiscal sponsors, and regranting organizations inflate grant counts without representing real funding decisions. We identify and remove them.

    Step 4

    Validate Against Reality

    We test our data against real funding outcomes using holdout years the model never saw. Every claim we make is backed by measurable results.

    Processed Data vs. Raw Filings

    The difference between ingesting data and understanding it.

    CapabilitySciRiseRaw 990 Ingestion
    Entity resolution
    Intermediaries filtered
    Grant-to-nonprofit matching
    Validated against real outcomes
    Every recommendation traceable to source filing
    Predictive model (not just search)

    Statistically Validated

    We trained on historical filings, then tested whether we could predict new funding relationships that actually appeared in a future year. The model never saw the test data.

    28.7%

    Hit rate in top 10

    Nearly 1 in 3 nonprofits found a real future funder in our top picks.

    13.6x

    More accurate than keyword search

    Head-to-head comparison on the same data and evaluation criteria.

    30,000+

    Nonprofits tested

    Statistically significant (p < 0.0001).

    Transparent and Traceable

    Every recommendation links back to real IRS filings. No black boxes.

    Source-linked recommendations

    Every foundation recommendation traces back to specific IRS filings and real grant history. You can see exactly why a foundation was surfaced.

    Multi-year patterns, not single snapshots

    We analyze multiple years of filings to distinguish sustained giving from one-off grants. This means more reliable signals and fewer false leads.

    Explainable methodology

    Our validation methodology, test design, and results are published openly. We believe data tools should be held to the same standard as the research they support.

    See What Better Data Looks Like

    Sign up and explore foundation recommendations built on verified, validated data.

    No credit card required.

    Questions?